Skip to main content

A public health milestone: China publishes new Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines


Physical inactivity has long been a global public health issue. In response to this, China published new Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines for Chinese People in 2021 (PASBG 2021). This is a milestone in China’s public health, behavioural epidemiology and an important contribution to the Healthy China 2030 initiative. This commentary summarises the contents and highlighted the significance of the new guidelines. The new Chinese PASBG provide foundations for population-based estimates of healthy behaviours, strategies addressing physical inactivity and messages designed to encourage people to be more active. While the contents of the PASBG 2021 are mostly consistent with the World Health Organisation physical activity guidelines, it is unclear on what evidence they are based, and whether this included research in Chinese people. Physical activity research in China is very limited and it is urgently needed to advance national-based physical activity research in China in accordance with the behavioural epidemiology framework. The development of new PASBG is only the first step, now it is what is done to communicate and disseminate, provide opportunities and supportive environments that will make a difference to physical activity levels in China. As such, we hope the PASBG 2021 will not only become a document for educating Chinese people to move more, but also an impetus for improving population health research.


The health benefits of sufficient physical activity (PA) and limited sedentary behaviour (SB) are well established [1,2,3]. The development of PA and SB guidelines is an important public health initiative because it can serve to promote active lifestyles at the populational level [4, 5]. As the prevalence of PA is low and the prevalence of SB is high [6, 7], many countries (e.g., Canada, the USA, Australia) as well as the World Health Organisation (WHO) have published PA and SB guidelines [1, 8,9,10]. The development of evidence-based PA and SB guidelines can inform the general public of the health benefits of PA and SB and guide in how to become more physically active and less sedentary.

Few studies have examined PA and SB levels in the People’s Republic of China. However, those studies that did examine this found generally very concerning levels of PA and SB across all age groups [11,12,13,14,15]. For example, based on the WHO guidelines, less than 13% of Chinese children and adolescents met the PA recommendations [16]. Furthermore, only 22.4% of adults adhered to the PA recommendations [13].

In response to this public health issue, PA promotion and SB reduction have been given greater attention by Chinese governments, researchers and communities. On December 29 2021, the Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines (PASBG) for Chinese People 2021 (in Chinese: 中国人群身体活动指南2021) [17] was officially published by the Centres for Disease Control (CDC) of the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. The PASBG for Chinese people aims to prevent noncommunicable diseases and foster a healthy and active society.

The development of the PAG was initialised in 2018 and led by the Guideline Development Advisory Commission (GDAC) [16]. In 2020, the GDAC systematically evaluated the scientific evidence regarding the health benefits of PA, interviewed and consulted over 50 relevant experts from China (e.g., in medicine and exercise), and summarised their comments and suggestions. This work resulted in research-driven and evidence-based guidelines.

Guideline content

The Chinese PASBG mostly aligns with international guidelines (e.g., the World Health Organisation guidelines) [1, 9]. The guidelines consist of general principles and age-specific recommendations for children under 2 years old, children from 3 to 5 years old, children and adolescents from 6 to 17 years old, adults from 18 to 64 years old, older adults over 65 years old, and people living with chronic conditions. The Chinese PASBG comprises four general principles (see Table 1), which can be understood as follows: “moving is good, moving more is better, moving appropriately and moving regularly” [17]. This simple, concise and culturally relevant message is beneficial to the dissemination of the guidelines to the general public.

Table 1 Principles of the Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Guidelines for Chinese people

Table 2 presents the Chinese PASBG for different age groups. Their contents are consistent with those of other guidelines [1, 2, 9, 18]. Interestingly, in comparison with China’s previous guidelines (published in 2011), several noteworthy differences should be mentioned. The 2011 guidelines only focused on adults, while the new guidelines target the entire life course. The 2011 guidelines only focused on PA, while the new guidelines also focus on SB, although only for children and adolescents. Unlike the previous guidelines, the new guidelines also focus on people living with disability, pregnant women and people living with cancer, type II diabetes or cardiovascular disease.

Table 2 Specific recommendations on physical activity and sedentary behavior for Chinese people

Importance of the guidelines

The most important role of the Chinese PASBG is that the goal will be to educate the public on how to increase PA and reduce SB, as they recommend specific types, intensity, duration, and frequency of PA or SB for populations of different ages and those living with chronic disease. These messages are also important for clinical practice and for health care service professionals.

The Chinese PASBG will also provide a foundation for the surveillance and monitoring of PA and SB. Based on the new guidelines and recommended levels, researchers can assess populational levels of PA and active play in children, as well as moderate-to-vigorous PA and muscle-strengthening activities in adults and older adults. This will be useful in updating national health data and for the development of public health policy. Surveillance data are urgently needed, as little is known about the levels of PA and SB at the populational level in China [3, 12]. As the Chinese PASBG align with the guidelines of other countries and the WHO, the PA and SB levels of the Chinese population will be comparable to those of other countries.

The development of the new Chinese PASBG represents an important contribution to the global strategy for promoting active lifestyles. The WHO has launched the Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030 (GAPPA) to combat the global prevalence of insufficient PA and excessive SB [19]. As such, WHO members are urged to make serious efforts to help achieve GAPPA’s ambitious goals. The development of the new PASBG demonstrates China’s commitment to GAPPA and continuous efforts to reduce the prevalence of physical inactivity among Chinese people. It also suggests that the Chinese government has an action plan to address the public health crisis of inactive and sedentary lifestyles [20,21,22].

Importantly, the key messages and four principles of the Chinese PASBG can be summarised in just 16 Chinese characters (动则有益, 多动更好, 适度量力, 贵在坚持). A simple, easy-to-understand and culturally relevant message is very powerful within a public health context and has the potential to achieve change.

While developing and issuing the PASBG is an important step in response to the Healthy China 2030 Plan, having guidelines itself will not change population PA and SB behaviours—it is what is done to communicate and disseminate, provide opportunities and supportive environments that will make a difference. As such, it is important that Chinese Governments, at all levels and across different departments, take the next step to actively implement and disseminate the PASBG in appropriate formats tailored to different demographics across China, as well as provide the conditions that will make it easier for people to be more active and less sedentary.

Perspectives on future updates of the guidelines

While a large body of evidence has confirmed the beneficial impact of sufficient PA and limited SB on health, this evidence is mainly based on populations from Western countries [23]. Owing to cultural and genetic differences [24], it is possible that the health effects of PA and SB in Western populations cannot be fully replicated in the Chinese population [3]. As such, under ideal circumstances, the Chinese PASBG would be based on studies conducted in Chinese populations.

However, to date, we do not know on which evidence-based publications the PASBG are based. When examining the WHO [1], American [25], and Canadian [9, 26] guidelines, researchers can easily access scientific advisory reports that include the latest evidence and that form the basis for formulating the new guidelines. For example, web annex evidence profiles [23] and many research papers [1, 2, 18, 27,28,29,30,31,32] contain supportive evidence of the WHO Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines. These complementary research-driven documents help professionals, policy-makers and the public better understand the contents of the published guidelines and confirm their high quality. As such, we hope that the GDAC will publish a scientific advisory report that supports the new PASBG. In addition, although the GDAC announced that they did conduct a vigorous and systematic scientific review, we are unaware of the process that was used in developing the PASBG. Ideally, future versions or updates of the PASBG will apply a more transparent development process and consider, for example, using the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach [33], which is a framework for the adoption, adaptation, and de-novo development of trustworthy recommendations.

Only people living with cancer, type II diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases are targeted in the Chinese guidelines [17]. This means that people living with other chronic conditions may be overlooked in clinical settings. However, accumulating evidence suggests that most people, even those living with specific conditions, can participate in appropriate PA [34]. As such, we hope that future editions of the PAG can provide specific recommendations for people living with other diseases, in line with information provided by the WHO guidelines (e.g., hypertension, HIV) [8].

Finally, while it is promising that the Chinese PASBG addresses limiting SB in children and adolescents, it is unclear why the PASBG does not include recommendations on SB for adults, which is inconsistent with the WHO [8] and Canadian guidelines [35]. The limited evidence available indicates that Chinese adults are exposed to prolonged SB [13], as such this gap should be addressed in the future, as SB has been recognised as an important health risk factor [36]. Furthermore, other countries, such as Canada, have developed 24-h Movement Guidelines that incorporate sleep [9, 10, 35]. A 24-h approach to movement behaviours should be considered in future versions of the PASBG.

Future research needs

The development of the new Chinese PASBG is a welcome development and a milestone for public health. However, PA and SB research in China is still in its infancy. New research would strengthen the underpinnings of future guidelines. From the perspective of the behavioural epidemiology framework [37], more Chinese research is needed on (1) links between PA or SB and health outcomes, (2) methods for assessing PA and SB, (3) factors influencing PA and SB, (4) interventions to increase PA or decrease SB, and (5) translating intervention research into practice.

Research on the long-term health benefits of sufficient PA and limited SB in Chinese people is urgently needed, as the current evidence is mainly based on cross-sectional studies [3]. Among Chinese people, evidence remains scarce, especially from longitudinal studies and randomised controlled trials [3]. Additionally, little is known about the associations of different modalities of PA or different types of SB with health outcomes in different populations.

Surveillance and monitoring of PA and SB, alongside associated health outcomes, among Chinese people on a large scale are also required [3, 38]. Although some national data have been reported, most surveillance and monitoring systems are cross-sectional and use self-report measures; longitudinal and device-measured data are thus still lacking. Surveillance and monitoring of PA and SB in the general population is a current priority and should include people living with different health conditions as well as individuals of different ethnicities.

Research on PA and SB correlates and determinants in China is mainly focused on young people [39] and is very limited in any other age group. Again, most of this evidence is based on cross-sectional data. Moreover, many studies have focused on individual and interpersonal correlates and determinants [3, 39], but little is known about other factors (e.g., culture, policy) involved in PA and SB among Chinese people.

Owing to real-world complexity and cultural differences, interventions to increase PA or reduce SB in China face many challenges and are therefore very rare [3, 11]. Furthermore, the successful scale-up of effective interventions and translation of research evidence in China are also lacking. Likewise, China-based PA and SB policy research is extremely rare. This inhibits a comprehensive and insightful understanding of PA and SB policy in China.

It is unclear whether the Chinese PASBG can achieve the health impacts of promoting PA and decreasing SB. However, prior to achieving this aim, the first step is to broadly disseminate the guidelines, particularly to the general public, in addition to health practitioners. To make more people aware of the guidelines, government and non-government collaborative support is needed, using multi-dimensional approaches to integrate the guidelines into the workplace, school, community and family as well as other key settings. Enhancing people’s awareness and strengthening their knowledge of the Chinese guidelines is essential to achieve impact. Translating knowledge of the guidelines into practice is an important next step in promoting active lifestyles. As there is no standardised action plan to efficiently disseminate the guidelines for different populations (e.g., school-aged children, parents, employees), it is important to disseminate the guidelines using theory-based dissemination approaches [27] and to then examine the health impacts of adhering to the guidelines.


The development and launch of the Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines for Chinese People 2021 is a milestone in the history of public health in China and has the potential to contribute greatly to global health. However, strong efforts are needed to widely disseminate the guidelines across the large geographically and ethnically dispersed Chinese population. Moreover, the Chinese PASBG have several imitations that should be addressed in future versions. Finally, the Chinese PASBG should be underpinned by Chinese research on PA and SB, but there is a lack of such research across all stages of the behavioural epidemiology framework, and this urgently needs to be addressed.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.



Physical activity


Sedentary behaviour


World Health Organization


Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines


Centre for Disease Control


Development Advisory Commission


Global Action Plan on Physical Activity


  1. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, Carty C, Chaput J-P, Chastin S, Chou R, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaput J-P, Willumsen J, Bull F, Chou R, Ekelund U, Firth J, Jago R, Ortega FB, Katzmarzyk PT. 2020 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5–17 years: summary of the evidence. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen P, Wang D, Shen H, Yu L, Gao Q, Mao L, Jiang F, Luo Y, Xie M, Zhang Y, et al. Physical activity and health in Chinese children and adolescents: expert consensus statement (2020). Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(22):1321–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ding D, Lawson KD, Kolbe-Alexander TL, Finkelstein EA, Katzmarzyk PT, van Mechelen W, Pratt M. The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1311–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aubert S, Barnes JD, Abdeta C, Abi Nader P, Adeniyi AF, Aguilar-Farias N, Andrade Tenesaca DS, Bhawra J, Brazo-Sayavera J, Cardon G, et al. Global matrix 3.0 physical activity report card grades for children and youth: results and analysis from 49 countries. J Phys Activity Health. 2018;15(s2):S251–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(10):e1077–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Organization WH. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tremblay MS, Carson V, Chaput J-P. Introduction to the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6 Suppl. 3):S311–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ross R, Tremblay M. Introduction to the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults aged 18–64 years and adults aged 65 years or older: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020;45(10 Suppl 2):S57–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bao R, Chen S-T, Wang Y, Xu J, Wang L, Zou L, Cai Y. Sedentary behavior research in the Chinese population: a systematic scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(10):3576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shen H, Yan J, Hong J-T, Clark C, Yang X-N, Liu Y, Chen S-T. Prevalence of physical activity and sedentary behavior among Chinese children and adolescents: variations, gaps, and recommendations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tian Y, Jiang C, Wang M, Cai R, Zhang Y, He Z, Wang H, Wu D, Wang F, Liu X, et al. BMI, leisure-time physical activity, and physical fitness in adults in China: results from a series of national surveys, 2000–14. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(6):487–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao Y, Cronin NJ, Nevala N, Finni T. Validity of long-term and short-term recall of occupational sitting time in Finnish and Chinese office workers. J Sport Health Sci. 2020;9(4):345–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu Z, Tang Y, Zhuang J, Liu Y, Wu X, Cai Y, Wang L, Cao Z-B, Chen P. Physical activity, screen viewing time, and overweight/obesity among Chinese children and adolescents: an update from the 2017 physical activity and fitness in China—the youth study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen S-T, Liu Y, Tremblay MS, Hong J-T, Tang Y, Cao Z-B, Zhuang J, Zhu Z, Wu X, Wang L, et al. Meeting 24-h movement guidelines: prevalence, correlates, and the relationships with overweight and obesity among Chinese children and adolescents. J Sport Health Sci. 2021;10(3):349–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Composing and Editorial Board of Physical Activity Guidelines for Chinese. Physical Activity Guidelines for Chinese (2021). Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2022, 38(2): 129–130. doi:

  18. Willumsen J, Bull F. Development of WHO guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep for children less than 5 years of age. J Phys Act Health. 2020;17(1):96–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Organization WH. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li F, Chen P. Addressing the public health concerns of physical inactivity, low levels of fitness, and unhealthy weight among Chinese school-aged children. J Sport Health Sci. 2017;6(4):379–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Li F, Mao L, Chen P. Physical activity and prevention of chronic disease in Chinese youth: a public health approach. J Sport Health Sci. 2019;8(6):512–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li F. Physical activity and health in the presence of China’s economic growth: meeting the public health challenges of the aging population. J Sport Health Sci. 2016;5(3):258–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. World Health O. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: web annex: evidence profiles. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chung HC, Keiller DR, Roberts JD, Gordon DA. Do exercise-associated genes explain phenotypic variance in the three components of fitness? A systematic review & meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(10): e0249501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, George SM, Olson RD. The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2018;320(19):2020–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tremblay MS, Chaput J-P, Adamo KB, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Choquette L, Duggan M, Faulkner G, Goldfield GS, Gray CE, et al. Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for the early years (0–4 years): an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(5):874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tomasone JR, Kauffeldt KD, Morgan TL, Magor KW, Latimer-Cheung AE, Faulkner G, Ross-White A, Poitras V, Kho ME, Ross R. Dissemination and implementation of national physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and/or sleep guidelines among community-dwelling adults aged 18 years and older: a systematic scoping review and suggestions for future reporting and research. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020;45(10 Suppl. 2):S258–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hämäläinen R-M, Breda J, da Silva GF, Gongal G, Khan W, Mendes R, Nederveen L, Ramanandraibe N, Sako B, Whiting S. New global physical activity guidelines for a more active and healthier world: the WHO Regional Offices perspective. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Milton K, Bauman AE, Faulkner G, Hastings G, Bellew W, Williamson C, Kelly P. Maximising the impact of global and national physical activity guidelines: the critical role of communication strategies. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dempsey PC, Biddle SJH, Buman MP, Chastin S, Ekelund U, Friedenreich CM, Katzmarzyk PT, Leitzmann MF, Stamatakis E, van der Ploeg HP, et al. New global guidelines on sedentary behaviour and health for adults: broadening the behavioural targets. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. DiPietro L, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle SJH, Borodulin K, Bull FC, Buman MP, Cardon G, Carty C, Chaput J-P, Chastin S, et al. Advancing the global physical activity agenda: recommendations for future research by the 2020 WHO physical activity and sedentary behavior guidelines development group. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Segar ML, Marques MM, Palmeira AL, Okely AD. Everything counts in sending the right message: science-based messaging implications from the 2020 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schünemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Brozek J, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Mustafa RA, Manja V, Brignardello-Petersen R, Neumann I, Falavigna M, Alhazzani W, et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;81:101–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dempsey PC, Friedenreich CM, Leitzmann MF, Buman MP, Lambert E, Willumsen J, Bull F. Global Public Health Guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behavior for people living with chronic conditions: a call to action. J Phys Act Health. 2020;1:76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ross R, Chaput J-P, Giangregorio LM, Janssen I, Saunders TJ, Kho ME, Poitras VJ, Tomasone JR, El-Kotob R, McLaughlin EC, et al. Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for adults aged 18–64 years and adults aged 65 years or older: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020;45(10 Suppl. 2):S57–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Saunders TJ, McIsaac T, Douillette K, Gaulton N, Hunter S, Rhodes RE, Prince SA, Carson V, Chaput JP, Chastin S, et al. Sedentary behaviour and health in adults: an overview of systematic reviews. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020;45(10 Suppl. 2):S197-s217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sallis JF, Owen N, Fotheringham MJ. Behavioral epidemiology: a systematic framework to classify phases of research on health promotion and disease prevention. Ann Behav Med. 2000;22(4):294–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu Y. Promoting physical activity among Chinese youth: no time to wait. J Sport Health Sci. 2017;6(2):248–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lu C, Stolk RP, Sauer PJJ, Sijtsma A, Wiersma R, Huang G, Corpeleijn E. Factors of physical activity among Chinese children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We appreciate the Editor-in-Chief Professor Corneel Vandelanotte for his support in conceptualising and commenting on this article. We also thank Dr Zhiguang Zhang at Beijing Normal University for her helpful suggestions.


This study receives no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SC and JM conceived the idea; SC, JM and JH contributed to the first draft, CC, YY, ZY, PZ and YT edited the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sitong Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate


Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, S., Ma, J., Hong, J. et al. A public health milestone: China publishes new Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines. JASSB 1, 9 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: