Skip to main content

Meeting the WHO 24-h guidelines among 2–6-year-old children by family socioeconomic status before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study



The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed guidelines for 24-h physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour and sleep for young children. Lower socioeconomic status (SES) has been linked to a lower likelihood of meeting these guidelines. The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) raised concerns about young children’s opportunities to meet the guidelines. The study focused on the prevalence of meeting the WHO’s 24-h guidelines on screen time (ST), PA and sleep among 2–6-year-old children, in association with family SES, before COVID-19 outbreak in 2019, and during the pandemic in 2020 and 2021 in Finland.


Data were collected at three timepoints by an online survey through day-care centres. Meeting the WHO 24-h guidelines was defined for each behaviour, from a parent-reported seven-day recall of a typical day on weekdays and weekend days and adapted to the national context. Children were considered to meet the ST guideline if they had maximum of 60 min of ST, the PA guideline if they had minimum of 60 min of outdoor PA, and the sleep guidelines if they had minimum of 11/10/9 h (2/3–5/6 years) of good or very good quality sleep. Binary logistic regression models were used to examine the odds ratios of meeting the guidelines.


The prevalence of meeting the ST guideline was highest before the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019. The PA guideline was most met during the strict pandemic restrictions in 2020. Children from higher SES families were more likely to meet the ST and sleep duration guidelines either on weekdays or weekends. The PA guideline was met more on weekdays by children whose parents had lower education levels at all timepoints. In 2020, sleep quality guideline was less likely met by children with parents with the highest education levels.


Higher SES may increase the odds of young children meeting the ST and sleep duration guidelines, but the results are more complex regarding PA and SES. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ST, outdoor PA, and sleep of young children varied by family SES, and further research is recommended to identify causality of these relationships.


Screen time (ST), physical activity (PA) and sleep are invariably intertwined in early childhood and are associated directly and indirectly with various health outcomes [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Screen time—referring to screen viewing or digital media use for various purposes—makes up a significant portion of children’s sedentary behaviour during their waking hours [1] and is linked, for example, to poorer sleep [2,3,4] which in turn, is connected, for instance, to unfavourable body composition and emotional regulation [5]. Individual health benefits of high PA [6, 7] and low sedentary time [8] are shown already at an early age. The significance of ST, PA and sleep for young children’s health is widely recognized; therefore, the World Health Organization (WHO) [9] has developed guidelines for 24-h physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep for children under five. Guidelines for children from 5–6 years exist in the WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour [10] and the Finnish national recommendations for physical activity in early childhood [11]. These sedentary behaviour guidelines are directed towards sedentary and recreational ST. Meeting the WHO’s 24-h guidelines regarding ST, PA and sleep have been found to enhance favourable outcomes in cardiometabolic health [12,13,14], motor development [15] and psycho-social health in young children [16,17,18].

WHO 24-h guidelines for screen time, physical activity and sleep

For children under five years, the daily guidelines recommend no more than 60 min of sedentary ST and at least 180 min of PA in a variety of types spread throughout the day, with children aged 3–4 years spending at least 60 min in moderate-to-vigorous–intensity PA [9]. Good-quality sleep should cover 11–14 h a day for two-year-olds (including naps) and 10–13 h for 3–4-year-olds (with or without naps), with regular sleep and wake-up times. For children aged five years and above, the guidelines are to have at least 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous PA per day and to limit ST, especially recreational ST, but there is no specific maximum set for this age group [10]. National guidelines, however, recommend limitation of continuous sedentary time, such as using digital media, to 1 h for children under seven [11]. Regarding sleep, there is evidence that 5-year-olds need at least 10 h and 6-year-olds need 9 h of good-quality sleep per day [19].

Adherence to the WHO lifestyle guidelines

The prevalence of meeting the WHO guidelines for ST, PA and sleep varies according to the measurement method and age groups of participants in the research. As a computed average from 11 different countries, 13 percent of under 5-year-old children meet all the guidelines [20], when, for example, in some urban areas outside of Europe rates are reported to be as low as three percent [21, 22]. Compared with PA and sleep, the ST guideline is met more rarely [12, 20, 22, 23]. In Finland, the prevalence of meeting all the guidelines is reduced from 52 percent at the age of 6 years to 25 percent at the age of 8 years [13]. This is in agreement with research showing that ST in children increases with age [24, 25], a key behavioural component of the WHO 24-h guidelines. Apparently, the prevalence of children under six meeting the WHO 24-h guidelines in Finland is not yet publicized, so research attention in this area is welcome.

Socioeconomic differences in screen time, physical activity and sleep in young children

The socioeconomic status (SES) of the family may play an important role in young children’s ST, PA and sleep, and the situation among young children has not yet been established in research. A high household income level is associated with better adherence and a low income level with poorer adherence to the guidelines among children and youth aged from 5 to 17 years [26]. Higher parental education levels are found to diminish ST in toddlers of 3 years or under [27, 28] and 3–6-year-old children [29]. However, no parental education–level differences are found in children’s PA or other sedentary time [29]. Children aged 3–6 years and living in high-income settings are reported to exceed ST guidelines and still meet sleep guidelines more often than their counterparts living in low-income settings [30]. Elsewhere, higher income levels are favourably associated with a child’s ST [2] and lower sedentary behaviour but also with higher sleep variability in children aged 3–5 years [31]. Poverty is reported to be associated with low levels of moderate to vigorous PA in 1–3-year-old toddlers [32]. Lower parental education and later bedtimes are associated with high ST in 5-year-old children [33]. In later childhood and adolescence, low parental SES has been reported to be associated with low PA and high ST [1, 26, 34].

Impact of COVID-19 situation on young children’s screen time, physical activity and sleep

The outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has raised concerns about young children’s ability to meet the guidelines, particularly during the behavioural restrictions imposed [35, 36]. There are reports of 3–6-year-old children’s PA decreasing during COVID-19 and ST or sedentary behaviour increasing [37,38,39,40], as well as later bedtimes [38] and lower sleep efficiency [39]. However, there are also reports of children spending more time sleeping and in moderate-to-vigorous PA and less time in sedentary behaviour during the pandemic [40]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example in Spain, 0–12-year-old children’s sleep time was negatively correlated to their ST [41]. Furthermore, children who were able to spend time outdoors were more likely to meet all three guidelines than children whose freedom of movement was more restricted [42].

Materials and methods

The purpose of this study was to examine (1) the prevalence of 2–6-year-old Finnish children meeting the WHO 24-h guidelines for ST, PA and sleep and (2) the association of family SES with meeting the WHO guidelines. The study took place in 2019, 2020 and 2021, including a period of relatively strict restrictions in November 2020, when there were strong advisories for social distancing (including restrictions on organized PA), remote work and self-quarantining at home, with some day-care centre groups quarantined due to exposure to the virus. There was great areal variability in the epidemic situation around the country and in the restrictions imposed, particularly during the third data collection in November–December 2021, when the pandemic had continued for over a year. Overall, in Finland, the spread of COVID-19 followed the progression of the pandemic in other EU countries but with a lower incidence of infections; therefore, no complete lockdowns were imposed [43].

Sampling procedures

We gathered randomly selected, nationally representative, cross-sectional data of parents and guardians of children attending early childhood education, to investigate children’s ST, outdoor PA and sleep at three timepoints. The data collection lasted three weeks each year and was timed for November–December. The data were collected from 59 municipalities (out of Finland’s 310 municipalities) through day-care centres and pre-schools from parents of 2–6-year-old children using an online survey platform (Qualtrics). The municipalities were randomized by the probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling method and, after obtaining research permission from each, were included in the study. A total of two dropouts were replaced by a municipality from the same geographical area. The sampling procedures have been reported elsewhere [44].


The research complied with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and received institutional ethical approval (NTU IRB 2019-02-036). The parents received an invitation to participate in the study through their early childhood education online communication systems and, in one municipality, on paper. The parents were informed that participation was voluntary and anonymous. The voluntariness of the participation was confirmed by parental consent before they completed the survey.

Survey Instrument

Surveillance of digital Media in eArLy ChiLdhood Questionnaire (SMALLQ®) was developed to solicit information from parents about the digital (ST, type and purpose) and non-digital media (indoor and outdoor play, sleep duration and quality) habits of their children on a weekday and on the weekend, their attitudes and concerns about child digital media use, and their awareness and practice of child media use guidelines [45]. It was originally developed and validated in Singapore and the development and validity process is previously described by Chia, Tay and Chua [45].

Face and content validity of the questionnaire items in SMALLQ® were established by a number of independent experts based upon the criteria of representativeness, clarity, and relevance [46] as well as by feedback solicited from a group of parents of preschool children who were not involved in the research. The internal consistency of Finnish data was computed as 0.72, based upon self-reported parent and child digital media use on the weekday and weekend. Cronbach’s alpha values of 0.70 to 0.90 are deemed to be valued and acceptable [51]. In summary, the online SMALLQ® was adjudged to have sufficient face and content-validity with acceptable internal consistency or reliability.

The original language of SMALLQ® was Singaporean English. For this study, it was translated to the native languages of Finland (Finnish and Swedish) and minority language (Russian) by a panel of local experts using the established WHO method for cultural adaptation [47]. SMALLQ® was then sent out to the target population in four different languages including English.

Description of the variables

The outcome variables analyzed in this research were the child’s digital media use in total (considered here as ST), outdoor physical play, sleep duration and sleep quality. Outdoor PA has been shown to indicate total PA [48,49,50], and outdoor play is emphasized in the national recommendations of PA for under school-aged children [11]. Regarding the child’s digital media use, parents were asked to estimate their child’s digital media use outside of pre-school/day-care, for example, at home. They filled in the hours and minutes, after the statement “In the last 7 days, my child spent time in…” for a typical weekday and a typical weekend day, in five different digital media activities: (1) using media for education/learning, (2) using media for entertainment, (3) creating media, (4) communicating and (5) others. The child’s outdoor physical play was estimated (alongside six other non-digital media activities) in a similar way by a parent’s recall of the last 7 days, apart from pre-school/day-care, as were night- and daytime sleep durations. The overall quality of the child’s night-time sleep was scaled in five levels: (1) very poor, (2) quite poor, (3) average, (4) good and (5) very good.

Explanatory variables were the age and gender of the child and parent and SES, determined by parental education and household income levels. In the questionnaire, the options for parental education levels were: (1) No formal education, (2) Primary/elementary school, (3) Secondary/high school, (4) Vocational school, (5) Bachelor’s degree and (6) Master’s degree or higher. Household’s income level was formed according to Finnish income levels [51]. For the analysis, levels 1–3 of parental education and levels 1–2 (two lowest-income levels) and 6–8 (three highest-income levels) of household income were combined, respectively.

Benchmarking against the WHO 24-h guidelines

ST, outdoor PA, sleep duration and sleep quality were recoded as binary variables, with values of 0 = the guidelines are not met and 1 = the guidelines are met. Child’s ST was calculated as a sum of all different digital media activities, separately for a typical weekday and a typical weekend day. The limit for meeting the ST guideline was set to ≤ 1 h, according to the WHO 24-h guidelines and the Finnish national recommendations [11]. For the PA guideline, the limit was set to ≥ 1 h of outdoor PA, adapted from the WHO 24-h guidelines, acknowledging the average time children spend on PA during pre-school/day-care [52] and recognizing that Finnish children’s outdoor play is mostly moderate-to-vigorous PA [53]. The limit of meeting the sleep duration guideline was set to ≥ 11 h for 2–year-olds, ≥ 10 h for 3–5-year-olds, and ≥ 9 h for 6-year-olds, adapted from the WHO 24-h guidelines and Galland et al. [19]. The limit for meeting the sleep quality guideline was set to 4) good or 5) very good, according to the WHO 24-h guidelines.

Statistical analyses

For the statistical analyses, Mplus was used [54]. We used binary logistic regression models to find odds ratios in meeting the guidelines, together with estimating the full information maximum likelihood. Explanatory variables (parental education, household income, parental age and gender, child’s age and gender) were put in the model simultaneously (Additional file 1). To make sure that the missing at random (MAR) assumption is met, the parental concern variable should be added to the model as an auxiliary variable [55, 56]. When missing data of outcome variables and other variables of the dataset were analysed, a variable of parental concerns on their child’s digital media use was a statistically significant predictor of missing values (Additional file 1). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.


The sample size was 2529 in 2019, 5472 in 2020 and 5103 in 2021 (13,104 in total). Of the parents, 84 percent were mothers, and of the children, 52 percent were boys (Table 1). Guardians other than mothers and fathers and child’s genders other than girls and boys were excluded from the analysis due to their low frequency. The mean age of the parents was 36.5 (5.64 SD), and that of the children was 4.4 (1.33 SD). A bachelor’s degree was held by 37 percent of parents. Table 1 shows the demographics of the participants in the study.

Table 1 Demographics of the parents and their children in the study from 2019–2021

Table 2 shows that the percentage of meeting the ST guideline was higher on weekdays than on weekends in all timepoints. On weekdays, the adherence was higher in 2019 (42%) and 2021 (40%) than in 2020 (36%). On weekends, the adherence was highest in 2019 (21%), while only 17% met the guideline in 2020 and 2021. The PA guideline was met more often in 2020 (62%) compared with the other two years (56%) on weekdays, and for weekends, in 2020 (92%) and 2021 (89%) compared to 2019 (85%). The guideline for sleep duration was met, with nearly four-fifths of the total sample attaining them on weekdays and with 90 percent of the total sample on weekends. Sleep quality was good or excellent for 82–85 percent of the children on weekdays and for 87–90 percent on weekends. Meeting the sleep quality guideline was nearly five percentage points lower in 2021 compared with the previous two years.

Table 2 The percentages of young children meeting the WHO 24-h guidelines in 2019–2021 on a typical weekday and a typical weekend day

Compared with mid-income households, children from higher-income households were 1.3 times more likely to meet the ST guideline on weekends in 2019 and weekdays in 2020 and 2021 (Table 3). Parents with a master’s degree or higher had their children 1.2–1.5 times more likely to meet the ST guideline than children of parents with a bachelor’s degree in 2021 and on weekdays of 2020.

Table 3 Coefficients and odds ratios (OR) of having maximum of 60 min of ST

Compared with the mid-income households, children from higher-income households were less likely to meet the PA guideline on weekdays in 2020 and 2021, while children from lower-income levels had lower likelihood on the weekends of 2019 and 2021 (Table 4). On the weekends of 2020, children from the highest-income level households were 1.6 times more likely to spend at least 1 h on outdoor PA. Compared with parents with a bachelor’s degree, parents with vocational education levels increased the likelihood of children meeting the PA guideline on weekdays, and a master’s degree or higher decreased the likelihood. On the weekends of 2020, the lowest education level was connected to a 0.6 times lower likelihood of meeting the PA guideline.

Table 4 Coefficients and odds ratios (OR) of having minimum of 60 min of outdoor PA

Children from higher-income households were more likely to meet the sleep duration guidelines than mid-income households on weekends (Table 5). On weekdays in 2021, children from lower-income households were less likely to meet the sleep duration guideline than mid-income households. In 2020, parents with lower education levels had their children less likely to meet the sleep duration guideline than parents with bachelor’s degrees.

Table 5 Coefficients and odds ratios (OR) of having a total sleep duration of 11/10/9 h (2/3–5/6 years)

Children from higher-income households were more likely to meet the sleep quality guideline on weekends in 2020, and children from lower-income homes were less likely to meet the guideline on weekdays in 2021 (Table 6). In 2020, parents with higher education levels had their children less likely to meet the sleep quality guideline than parents with bachelor’s degrees.

Table 6 Coefficients and odds ratios (OR) of having minimum of good quality of sleep


This study aimed to examine the prevalence of 2–6-year-old children in Finland meeting the WHO 24-h guidelines for ST, PA and sleep before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and its association with family SES, namely annual household income and parental level of education.

Adherence to the WHO 24-h guidelines

Children met the ST guideline more often during weekdays than on weekends and the PA and sleep guidelines more often during weekends compared with weekdays at all timepoints. This may be caused by the different amounts of time available after work and pre-school hours in families on regular weekdays compared with weekend days or days off. Finnish pre-school days are known to be well structured [11] with physically active hours from around 10 am to 11 am and 3 pm to 4 pm [52], and it has been shown that during a pre-school day 97 percent of children engage in at least 1 h on outdoor PA [53]. This may further explain the prevalence of outdoor PA observed in this study, where the examined time was outside working and pre-school hours.

The adherence to the ST guideline was significantly lower on weekdays and weekends in 2020 during the restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic than the time before the pandemic outbreak in 2019. When the pandemic was still ongoing in 2021 but with fewer restrictions than in 2020, the adherence to the ST guideline nearly reached the level of 2019 on weekdays, but the weekend-ST remained the same as in 2020.

The prevalence of meeting the PA guideline was highest in 2020 during a period of relatively strict restrictions when attending social activities outside the home was curtailed. Other findings suggest decreased PA during the COVID-19 pandemic [37,38,39,40]. Some plausible explanations for these findings are noteworthy. For example, home yard features are known to be associated with young children’s outdoor play and PA [57, 58], also during the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions [42]. The outdoor environment is accessible to nearly everyone in Finland, so even though structured sports, for instance, were partly restricted, children could still freely engage in outdoor play.

The prevalence of meeting the sleep guidelines was relatively high compared to other findings [14, 18, 21] and similar to others [12, 15, 17], which can partly be explained by the differences in the measurement methods. A significant decline in sleep quality in 2021 compared with the two previous years is concerning, and continued monitoring of these results is needed to ascertain whether these observations become a longer-term trend or if sleep quality recovers to levels that were present before the pandemic.

Associations with family socioeconomic status

Higher annual household income and higher parental education levels increased the odds of children meeting the ST guideline. These findings parallel the results for sleep duration, with lower household income and lower parental education levels decreasing the odds of meeting the sleep duration guideline. However, none of these results was shown to be significant throughout weekdays and weekend days at different timepoints. Other studies have indicated that higher parental education may mitigate young children’s ST [1, 27, 28], which is also connected to sleep [3, 4, 33]. However, sleep quality in the present research showed a contrary result in 2020, when children with parents with the highest education levels had their sleep quality less likely to meet the recommended levels. The disparity in this finding may reflect an imbalance between parental alertness towards the sleep guidelines and their child’s actual sleep, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Altogether, when discerning the significance of the overall results for both sleep guidelines, it appears that there is more favourable sleep among children from higher SES families.

In PA, a weekday-pattern by parental education level was detected, with children of less educated parents being more likely to meet the PA guideline than children of higher educated parents in all timepoints. Meeting the PA guideline by household income level was rather inconsistent; for instance, there was a lower likelihood of children meeting the PA guideline at both lower and higher income levels than at the mid-income level. Additionally, there was a contradiction in the highest income class, in which the likelihood of meeting the guideline was higher on weekends in 2020 but lower on weekdays in 2021. The reason for this finding is not yet apparent. Nonetheless, children from low- and middle-income countries are reported to meet the PA guideline more often than those from high-income countries [42]. Higher SES parents tend to work beyond regular working hours [59], and these parents may not have a clear division between work and free time compared with parents of lower income and education levels, especially during the COVID-19-pandemic. Less educated parents tended to work in sectors where remote work might not have been possible, with a clear distinction upheld between work and free time within families. These explanations are plausible but need to be confirmed in future research. Overall, household income level was not a significant factor in explaining children’s outdoor physical play in 2019, 2020 and 2021 in Finland.

Further research and practical implications

In relation to the WHO guidelines for ST, PA and sleep in young children, in the time before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, ST is identified as one that has exceeded the guidelines the most. Overindulgence in daily screen viewing and video game playing are risk factors for night-time sleep, while quiet learning sedentary behaviour does not correlate with sleep duration in young children [6]. Further research should aim to more closely distinguish different aspects of ST, such as sedentary and non-sedentary ST, the extent to which children engage in them, and how these engagements affect the holistic well-being of children. For parents, this is very important, as the WHO Guidelines for physical activity and sedentary behaviour covering children five years and older [10], do not set a maximum daily time limit on ST engagement. The guidelines only recommend limiting recreational ST and having 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous PA and adequate good-quality sleep.

Further research is recommended to examine the bi-directional impact that ST, PA and sleep, coupled with the complexities of familial dyads, have on each other and on the well-being of young children. Lifestyle behaviours in adults and young children have been disrupted and altered significantly and in complex ways by the COVID-19 pandemic and may take some time before it becomes stabilized as the pandemic becomes endemic. Nonetheless, professionals working with young children and their families should acknowledge these changes and take practical steps to safeguard the good health and well-being of children and caregivers.

Strengths and limitations

This study was implemented with a randomized nationally representative sample, using a valid and reliable online survey (SMALLQ®). To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate in a national sample of children’s parent-reported digital media habits, outdoor physical play, sleep duration and sleep quality in Finland before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019, 2020 and 2021. Lifestyle behaviour surveys may be affected by recall imprecision [60] and social desirability bias [61], and these were, respectively, minimized in the SMALLQ® by having the recall of ST, PA and sleep habits limited to a seven-day recall and by having the survey remain anonymous with no personal identifiable information.

Online surveys of this nature appear to have less of a reach to people from a lower SES [62], however, this sample achieved adequate national representativeness [51, 63]. This may be because the public early childhood education centres are feasible platforms to reach nearly all SES groups.

Moreover, it should be noted that the definition for meeting the WHO guidelines differs across studies and therefore comparisons of the results should be done with caution. In this study, the national guidelines for under school-aged children [11] were acknowledged for the cultural context of the sample. These applications concerned the importance of outdoor play in children’s PA and the limitation of continuous sedentary time to 1 h.


Adherence to the ST guideline among 2–6-year-old children was lowest and to the PA guideline highest during the most stringent COVID-19 restrictions in 2020. Sleep quality was reduced during the second year of the pandemic in 2021. High family SES may increase the odds of children meeting the ST and sleep guidelines, but engaging in outdoor PA is more complex by family SES. Professionals working with young children and their families should continue to monitor and respond to unfavourable changes in children’s ST, PA and sleep during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic to safeguard the future health of children. More research is needed to track the causality of these relationships.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.



Coronavirus disease 2019


Physical activity


Socioeconomic status


Screen time


World Health Organization


  1. Lampinen EK, Eloranta AM, Haapala EA, Lindi V, Väistö J, Lintu N, et al. Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and socioeconomic status among Finnish girls and boys aged 6–8 years. Eur J Sport Sci. 2017;17(4):462–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Waller NA, Zhang N, Cocci AH, D’Agostino C, Wesolek-Greenson S, Wheelock K, et al. Screen time use impacts low-income preschool children’s sleep quality, tiredness, and ability to fall asleep. Child Care Health Dev. 2021;47(5):618–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Falbe J, Davison KK, Franckle RL, Ganter C, Gortmaker SL, Smith L, et al. Sleep duration, restfulness, and screens in the sleep environment. Pediatrics. 2015;135(2):e367–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Magee CA, Lee JK, Vella SA. Bidirectional relationships between sleep duration and screen time in early childhood. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(5):465–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaput JP, Gray CE, Poitras VJ, Carson V, Gruber R, Birken CS, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between sleep duration and health indicators in the early years (0–4 years) [Review]. BMC Public Health. 2017;1(Suppl 5):855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang Z, Lei W. A study on the relationship between physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep duration in preschool children. Front Public Health. 2021;9:299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Bock F, Genser B, Raat H, Fischer JE, Renz-Polster H. A participatory physical activity intervention in preschools: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(1):64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saunders TJ, Tremblay MS, Mathieu MÈ, Henderson M, O’Loughlin J, Tremblay A, et al. Associations of sedentary behavior, sedentary bouts and breaks in sedentary time with cardiometabolic risk in children with a family history of obesity. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11): e79143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization. Guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep for children under 5 years of age. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Accessed 24 Jan 2022.

  10. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Accessed 24 Jan 2022

  11. Ministry of Education and Culture. Finnish recommendations for physical activity in early childhood 2016. Joy, play and doing together. 2016;48.

  12. Kim H, Ma J, Harada K, Lee S, Gu Y. Associations between adherence to combinations of 24-h movement guidelines and overweight and obesity in Japanese preschool children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(24):9320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leppänen MH, Haapala EA, Väistö J, Ekelund U, Brage S, Kilpeläinen TO, et al. Longitudinal and cross-sectional associations of adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines with cardiometabolic risk. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021;32(1):255–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guan H, Zhang Z, Wang B, Okely AD, Tong M, Wu J, et al. Proportion of kindergarten children meeting the WHO guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep and associations with adiposity in urban Beijing. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kracht CL, Webster EK, Staiano AE. Relationship between the 24-hour movement guidelines and fundamental motor skills in preschoolers. J Sci Med Sport. 2020;23(12):1185–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor RW, Haszard JJ, Healey D, Meredith-Jones KA, Taylor BJ, Galland BC. Adherence to 24-h movement behavior guidelines and psychosocial functioning in young children: a longitudinal analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18(1):110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McNeill J, Howard SJ, Vella SA, Cliff DP. Compliance with the 24-Hour movement guidelines for the early years: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with executive function and psychosocial health in preschool children. J Sci Med Sport. 2020;23(9):846–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Colman I, Goldfield GS, Janssen I, Wang J, Tremblay MS, et al. 24-Hour movement behaviors and internalizing and externalizing behaviors among youth. J Adolesc Health. 2021;68(5):969–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Galland BC, Taylor BJ, Elder DE, Herbison P. Normal sleep patterns in infants and children: a systematic review of observational studies. Sleep Med Rev. 2012;16(3):213–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feng J, Zheng C, Sit CHP, Reilly JJ, Huang WY. Associations between meeting 24-hour movement guidelines and health in the early years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2021;39(22):2545–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Feng J, Huang WY, Reilly JJ, Wong SHS. Compliance with the WHO 24-h movement guidelines and associations with body weight status among preschool children in Hong Kong. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021;46(10):1273–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. de Lucena Martins CM, Clark CCT, Ribeiro Bandeira PF, Mota J, Duncan MJ. Association between compliance with the 24-Hour movement guidelines and fundamental movement skills in preschoolers: a network perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(15):5443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee ST, Wong JE, Chan GKL, Poh BK. Association between compliance with movement behavior guidelines and obesity among Malaysian preschoolers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9):4611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Paudel S, Jancey J, Subedi N, Leavy J. Correlates of mobile screen media use among children aged 0–8: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10): e014585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rideout V, Robb MB. The Common Sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight, 2020 [Internet]. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media; 2020. Accessed 20 Jun 2022.

  26. Guerrero MD, Vanderloo LM, Rhodes RE, Faulkner G, Moore SA, Tremblay MS. Canadian children’s and youth’s adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic: a decision tree analysis. J Sport Health Sci. 2020;9(4):313–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bergmann C, Dimitrova N, Alaslani K, Almohammadi A, Alroqi H, Aussems S, et al. Young children’s screen time during the first COVID-19 lockdown in 12 countries. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):2015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Matarma T, Koski P, Löyttyniemi E, Lagström H. The factors associated with toddlers’ screen time change in the STEPS Study: a two-year follow-up. Prev Med. 2016;1(84):27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lehto E, Ray C, Vepsäläinen H, Korkalo L, Lehto R, Kaukonen R, et al. Increased Health and Wellbeing in Preschools (DAGIS) Study-Differences in Children’s Energy Balance-Related Behaviors (EBRBs) and in long-term stress by parental educational level. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):E2313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tomaz SA, Hinkley T, Jones RA, Watson ED, Twine R, Kahn K, et al. Screen time and sleep of rural and urban south african preschool children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(15):5449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kang AW, Gans KM, Minkel J, Risica PM. Correlates of objectively measured sleep and physical activity among Latinx 3-To-5-year old children. J Pediatr Nurs. 2021;1(60):40–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Armstrong B, Covington LB, Hager ER, Black MM. Objective sleep and physical activity using 24-hour ankle-worn accelerometry among toddlers from low-income families. Sleep Health. 2019;5(5):459–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Descarpentrie A, Saldanha-Gomes C, Guivarch C, Dargent-Molina P, de Lauzon-Guillain B, Plancoulaine S, et al. Family socioecological correlates of lifestyle patterns in early childhood: a cross-sectional study from the EDEN mother-child Cohort. Nutrients. 2021;13(11):3803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Männikkö N, Ruotsalainen H, Miettunen J, Marttila-Tornio K, Kääriäinen M. Parental socioeconomic status, adolescents’ screen time and sports participation through externalizing and internalizing characteristics. Heliyon. 2020;6(2): e03415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kokko S, Rinta-Antila K, Villberg J, Hirvensalo M, Koski P, Ng K. Physical activity of Finnish adolesence during the pandemic in spring 2020 [in Finnish] in Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic to Finnish population’s physical activity - Publications of the National Sports Council 2020:2 Marko Kantomaa (ed.). 2021 p. 17–20.

  36. Vasankari T, Jussila AM, Husu P, Tokola K, Vähä-Ypyä H, Kokko S, et al. Covid restrictions had strong effect on the PA of children and youth [in Finnish] in Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic to Finnish population’s physical activity - Publications of the National Sports Council 2020:2 Marko Kantomaa (ed.) [Internet]. 2021, p. 12–6. Accessed 29 Jun 2022.

  37. Hyunshik K, Jiameng M, Sunkyoung L, Ying G. Change in Japanese children’s 24-hour movement guidelines and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):22972.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Beck AL, Huang JC, Lendzion L, Fernandez A, Martinez S. Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic on parents’ perception of health behaviors in children with overweight and obesity. Acad Pediatr. 2021;21(8):1434–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Alonso-Martínez AM, Ramírez-Vélez R, García-Alonso Y, Izquierdo M, García-Hermoso A. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep and self-regulation in Spanish preschoolers during the COVID-19 lockdown. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):E693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ng JYY, He Q, Chong KH, Okely AD, Chan CHS, Ha AS. The impact of COVID-19 on preschool-aged children’s movement behaviors in Hong Kong: a longitudinal analysis of accelerometer-measured data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(22):11907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Cachón-Zagalaz J, Zagalaz-Sánchez Ma L, Arufe-Giráldez V, Sanmiguel-Rodríguez A, González-Valero G. Physical activity and daily routine among children aged 0–12 during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Okely AD, Kariippanon KE, Guan H, Taylor EK, Suesse T, Cross PL, et al. Global effect of COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep among 3- to 5-year-old children: a longitudinal study of 14 countries. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):940.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health of Finland, Finnish Institute of Health and Welfare. Overview of the coronavirus situation [in Finnish]. 2020.,+THL+ja+Liisa-Maria+Voipio-Pulkki,+STM_121120.pdf/31306874-c027-279e-8179-bdf3a52fb79b/STM+ja+THL+tilannekatsaus+koronavirustilanteesta_Taneli+Puumalainen,+THL+ja+Liisa-Maria+Voipio-Pulkki,+STM_121120.pdf?t=1605166493894. Accessed 20 Jun 2022.

  44. Hasanen E, Koivukoski H, Kortelainen L, Vehmas H, Sääkslahti A. Sociodemographic correlates of parental co-participation in digital media use and physical play of preschool-age children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chia MYH, Tay LY, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Office of Education Research, Singapore, Chua TBK, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Physical Education and Sports Science Academic Group, Singapore. The Development of an Online Surveillance of Digital Media Use in Early Childhood Questionnaire- SMALLQTM- For Singapore. Monten J Sports Sci Med. 2019;8(2):77–80.

  46. Artino AR, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, Gehlbach H. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Med Teach. 2014;36(6):463–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. World Health Organisation. Process of Translation and Adaptation of Instruments. 2016. Accessed 11 Aug 2022

  48. Larouche R, Garriguet D, Tremblay MS. Outdoor time, physical activity and sedentary time among young children: The 2012–2013 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Can J Public Health. 2016;107(6):e500–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hinkley T, Crawford D, Salmon J, Okely AD, Hesketh K. Preschool children and physical activity: a review of correlates. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(5):435-441.e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gray C, Gibbons R, Larouche R, Sandseter EBH, Bienenstock A, Brussoni M, et al. What is the relationship between outdoor time and physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and physical fitness in children? A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(6):6455–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Official Statistics of Finland (OFS). Income distribution statistics [e-publication]. 2022. Accessed 29 Jun 2022.

  52. Soini A, Watt A, Tammelin T, Soini M, Sääkslahti A, Poskiparta M. Comparing the physical activity patterns of 3-year-old Finnish and Australian children during childcare and homecare days. Baltic J Health Phys Activity. 2014;6(3):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sääkslahti A, Mehtälä A, Tammelin T, editors. JOYPAM – The joy of motion, physical activity and motor skills of young children - Development stage 2019–2021 results report [in Finnish]. 2021;334.

  54. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User’s Guide. 8th ed. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Collins LM, Schafer JL, Kam CM. A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychol Methods. 2001;6(4):330–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Enders CK. Applied missing data analysis (methodology in the social sciences). New York London: The Guilford Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Armstrong GP, Maitland C, Lester L, Trost S, Trapp G, Boruff B, et al. Associations between the home yard and preschoolers’ outdoor play and physical activity. Public Health Res Pract. 2019;29(1):2911907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lee EY, Bains A, Hunter S, Ament A, Brazo-Sayavera J, Carson V, et al. Systematic review of the correlates of outdoor play and time among children aged 3–12 years. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18(1):41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Official Statistics of Finland (OSF). Time use [e-publication]. Structure Of Working Week 2009. 2022. Accessed 25 Apr 2022.

  60. Althubaiti A. Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. JMDH. 2016;4(9):211–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Adams SA, Matthews CE, Ebbeling CB, Moore CG, Cunningham JE, Fulton J, et al. The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(4):389–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lorant V, Demarest S, Miermans PJ, Van Oyen H. Survey error in measuring socio-economic risk factors of health status: a comparison of a survey and a census. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(6):1292–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Official Statistics of Finland (OSF). Statistics Finland - Educational structure of the population 2020 [Internet]. Statistics Finland; Accessed 11 Aug 2022.

Download references


We appreciate and thank the IISSAAR-international research group at Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. We thank our research team members Lauri Kortelainen, Jari Villberg and Siiri Peltola from the University of Jyväskylä. We also thank the municipalities and early childhood education units that partnered with us and all the participants who contributed to this study.


The research was funded by the Ministry of Education and Culture of Finland (Grant Number OKM/15/626/2019). This study is part of an international study called International iPreschooler Surveillance Study Among Asians and otheRs (IISSAAR). IISSAAR research was funded by Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) under the Education Research Funding Programme (OER 29/19 MCYH) and administered by National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Singapore MOE and NIE. The authors declare that the funder had no role in the design of the study or the collection, analysis and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conceptualization: HK, EH, HV and AS; methodology: MC, TC, HK, EH, HV and AS; formal analysis: HK and AT; investigation: HK; data curation: HK and AT; writing—original draft preparation: HK; writing—critical review and editing: HK, EH, AS, MC, TC and HV; visualization: HK; supervision: HV and AS; project administration: HK, EH, HV and AS; funding acquisition: HV and AS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

HK is a project researcher working on a study on children’s digital media behaviour in the Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences at the University of Jyväskylä, Finland. She has a master’s degree in Health Education. Her research interests are in promoting equal opportunities for health and well-being, especially for children and youth.

EH is a postdoctoral researcher in the social sciences of sport in the Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences at the University of Jyväskylä. Dr. Hasanen has worked in different research positions for over 10 years. Her research interests include social inequalities in physical activity.

AT is a professor in the Methodology Center for Human Sciences at the University of Jyväskylä. His interest is applying structural equation modelling in the context of multilevel and mixture modelling.

TC is a postgraduate researcher and a member of the IISSAAR research. He has a master’s degree in Exercise and Sport Studies. His role involves collaborating with different country collaborators to execute the international research project with the aim of increasing our understanding on how young children in different countries and cultures play, sit, and sleep. He has a keen interest in population health, physical activity and health education.

MC is a professor of education at the Physical Education and Sports Science Group at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. He is the Chief Principal Investigator for IISSAAR-international, where IISSAAR stands for International iPreschooler Surveillance Study Among Asians and otheRs.

HV (Senior Lecturer, Ph.D.) has a background in Sociology (M.Sc., University of Turku) and Sport Sociology (PhD University of Jyväskylä). Since 1999, she has worked as a lecturer and researcher in Sport Sociology and Sport Management at the University of Jyväskylä, Finland. Her research interests and activities focus on sport participation, the societal role of physical activity and the private sports sector. Dr. Vehmas is currently the President-Elect of the European Association for Sociology of Sport (EASS).

AS is an associate professor in sport pedagogy in the Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences at the University of Jyväskylä. She is the project leader of IISSAAR Finland. Her research interests include young children’s physical activity, motor development, health and well-being. She has been active in different national working groups, such as national physical activity recommendations for both pre-school and school-aged children.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henriikka Koivukoski.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki were adhered to in the study. Ethics approval for the research was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Nanyang Technological University (IRB-2019-02-036). All adult participants involved in the study gave informed consent to take part in the research.

Consent for publication

All adult participants involved in the study gave informed consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Coefficients and odds ratios (OR) of child meeting the WHO 24-hour guidelines in 2019, 2020, and 2021.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koivukoski, H., Hasanen, E., Tolvanen, A. et al. Meeting the WHO 24-h guidelines among 2–6-year-old children by family socioeconomic status before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study. JASSB 2, 2 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: